Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of bias of included non-randomized studies

From: Fluctuation of bone turnover markers’ levels in samples of gingival crevicular fluid after orthodontic stimulus: a systematic review

Author/year of publication

Bias due to confounding

Bias in selection of participants into the study

Bias in classification of interventions

Bias due to deviations from intended interventions

Bias due to missing data

Bias in measurement of outcomes

Bias in selection of the reported result

Overall

Bitra et al. 2017 [21]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Smuthkochorn et al. 2017 [22]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Yang et al. 2014 [23]

Serious risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Serious risk

Alfaqeeh et al. 2011 [24]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Batra et al. 2006 [25]

Critical risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Critical risk

Isik et al. 2005 [26]

Critical risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Critical risk

Perinetti et al. 2004 [27]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Perinetti et al. 2002 [28]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Griffiths et al. 1998 [29]

Serious risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Moderate risk

Low risk

Serious risk