From: A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
ROBIS question | No. of studies | Gwet’s AC1/Gwet’s AC2 | 95% CI | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Domain 1: study eligibility criteria | ||||
 1.1 | 14 | 0.73 | 0.46, 1.00 | < 0.001 |
 1.2 | 15 | 0.70 | 0.45, 0.95 | < 0.001 |
 1.3 | 15 | 0.62 | 0.39, 0.84 | < 0.001 |
 1.4 | 15 | 0.54 | 0.32, 0.76 | < 0.001 |
 1.5 | 15 | 0.64 | 0.40, 0.88 | < 0.001 |
 Domain 1Concerns regarding specification of study eligibility criteria | 15 | 0.61 | 0.29, 0.92 | 0.001 |
Domain 2: identification and selection of studies | ||||
 2.1 | 15 | 0.53 | 0.36, 0.69 | < 0.001 |
 2.2 | 14 | 0.42 | 0.16, 0.69 | 0.005 |
 2.3 | 15 | 0.72 | 0.53, 0.92 | < 0.001 |
 2.4 | 15 | 0.31 | − 0.08, 0.70 | 0.110 |
 2.5 | 15 | 0.56 | 0.14, 0.99 | 0.013 |
 Domain 2Concerns regarding methods used to identify and/or select studies | 15 | 0.29 | 0.03, 0.55 | 0.031 |
Domain 3: data collection and study appraisal | ||||
 3.1 | 15 | 0.95 | 0.66, 1.00 | < 0.001 |
 3.2 | 15 | 0.65 | 0.47, 0.84 | < 0.001 |
 3.3 | 15 | 0.57 | 0.40, 0.74 | < 0.001 |
 3.4 | 15 | 0.55 | 0.23, 0.88 | 0.003 |
 3.5 | 15 | 0.81 | 0.51, 1.00 | < 0.001 |
 Domain 3Concerns regarding methods used to collect data and appraise studies | 15 | 0.52 | 0.19, 0.83 | 0.004 |
Domain 4: synthesis and findings | ||||
 4.1 | 15 | 0.55 | 0.33, 0.77 | < 0.001 |
 4.2 | 13 | 0.55 | 0.29, 0.81 | 0.001 |
 4.3 | 15 | 0.80 | 0.62, 0.98 | < 0.001 |
 4.4 | 15 | 0.13 | − 0.19, 0.45 | 0.405 |
 4.5 | 14 | − 0.10 | − 0.52, 0.33 | 0.633 |
 4.6 | 15 | 0.23 | − 0.17, 0.64 | 0.235 |
 Domain 4Concerns regarding the synthesis and findings | 15 | 0.18 | − 0.08, 0.44 | 0.154 |
Risk of bias in the review | ||||
 A | 15 | 0.10 | − 0.25, 0.44 | 0.552 |
 B | 15 | 0.61 | 0.40, 0.83 | < 0.001 |
 C | 15 | 0.39 | 0.01, 0.76 | 0.009 |
 ROB | 15 | 0.43 | 0.10, 0.77 | 0.015 |