Skip to main content

Table 4 Tabular presentation for agreement of ROBIS results

From: A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2

Fibromyalgia review Phase 2 Phase 3
1. Study eligibility criteria 2. Identification and selection of studies 3. Data collection and study appraisal 4. Synthesis and findings 5. Risk of bias in the review
Homoeopathy
  1. Perry Low Low Low Unclear Low
  2. Boehm High Low Low High High
Acupuncture
  3. Mayhew Low High High Low Low
  4. Daya Low High High Low Low
  5. Langhorst Low High High Low Low
  6. Martin-Sanchez Low High High High High
  7. Cao Low High Low Low Low
  8. Deare Low Low Low Low Low
  9. Yang Low Low High High High
Chiropractic
  10. Ernst High Unclear High Unclear Unclear
Herbal Medicine
  11. Nascimento Low Low Low High Low
Multiple CAM reviews
  12. Holdcraft Low Low Low High Low
  13. Baronowsky Low Low Unclear High Low
  14. Terhorst Low High Low High High
  15. De Silva High High High Unclear Low
Colic review Phase 2 Phase 3
1. Study eligibility criteria 2. Identification and selection of studies 3. Data collection and study appraisal 4. Synthesis and findings 5. Risk of bias in the review
Multiple CAM therapies
  1. Perry Low Unclear Low Low Low
  2. Bruyas-Bertholon High High Unclear High High
  3. Harb High High Low High High
  4. Gutierrez-Castrellon Unclear High High High High
Manipulation therapies
  5. Dobson Low Low Low Low Low
  6. Gleberzon High High Unclear Unclear High
  7. Carne Low Low Low High Unclear
Acupuncture
  8. Skejeie Low Low Low Low Unclear
Herbal medicine
  9. Anheyer Unclear High Low High High
Probiotics
  10. Sung 2013 Unclear Low Low High Unclear
  11. Anabrees Low Low Low High Low
  12. Urbansk Low High High High High
  13. Xu Unclear Low Low Unclear Low
  14. Shreck Bird High High Low High High
  15. Dryl High High Unclear High High
  16. Sung 2018 High Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear