Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of included systematic reviews

From: Successful incorporation of single reviewer assessments during systematic review screening: development and validation of sensitivity and work-saved of an algorithm that considers exclusion criteria and count

  Derivation set Validation set
Systematic reviews, N (%) 10 (42%) 14 (58%)
Type of review, N (%)
 Systematic review without meta-analysis 7 (70%) 7 (50%)
 Systematic review with meta-analysis 2 (20%) 5 (36%)
 Scoping review 1 (10%) 2 (14%)
 Living review 0 (0%) 4 (29%)
Focus
 Therapeutic 3 (30%) 8 (57%)
 Diagnosis 3 (30%) 2 (14%)
 Prognosis 1 (10%) 1 (7%)
 Other 3 (30%) 3 (21%)
Screening, median (range)
 Abstract screened 484 (257 - 2469) 745.5 (232–9648)
 Full-text screened 110 (15 - 441) 150 (16–453)
 Eligible citations 27 (9 - 68) 21 (2–159)
 Reviewers 3 (2 - 6) 5 (2–13)
 Kappa 0.47 (0.25 - 0.76) 0.56 (0.37–0.9)
Field of study, N (%)
 Pediatrics 8 (80%) 9 (64%)
 Respirology 2 (20%) 1 (7%)
 Development 2 (20%) 0 (0%)
 Public Health 1 (10%) 5 (36%)
 Pathology 1 (10%) 3 (21%)
 Emergency 1 (10%) 1 (7%)
 Medical Education 1 (10%) 1 (7%)
 Surgery 1 (10%) 1 (7%)
 Neonatology 1 (10%) 0 (0%)
 Nursing 1 (10%) 0 (0%)
 Oncology 1 (10%) 0 (0%)
 Psychiatry 1 (10%) 0 (0%)
 Radiology 1 (10%) 0 (0%)
 Cardiology 0 (0%) 1 (7%)
 Critical care 0 (0%) 1 (7%)
  1. Type of review and field of study were not exclusive, as studies can cover multiple choices. Numbers add up to more than 100%