Table 5 False positives from default algorithms for each de-duplication method by publication type
Primary research publications | Non-primary research publications | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Full-text articles | Conference proceedings/abstracts | All | ||
Ovid multifile search | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
EndNote X9a | 81/208 (39%) | 4/208 (2%) | 85/208 (41%) | 113/208 (54%) |
Mendeley | 3/17 (18%) | 1/17 (6%) | 4/17 (24%) | 13/17 (76%) |
Zotero | 1/20 (5%) | 10/20 (50%) | 11/20 (55%) | 9/20 (45%) |
Covidence | 0/2 (0%) | 0/2 (0%) | 0/2 (0%) | 2/2 (100%) |
Rayyanb | 11/52 (21%) | 5/52 (10%) | 16/52 (31%) | 34/52(65%) |