Skip to main content

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria used when screening articles first by title and abstract and then by full text. Papers were included if they were primary studies of any study design. The population being studied was infants born early pre-term up to term. The studies were investigating monoclonal antibody prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis or placebo, on the outcome of recurrent wheeze or asthma. No studies investigating a population of infants with congenital defects were included, and no other RSV prophylaxis or treatment apart from monoclonal antibody was considered

From: Respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis for prevention of recurrent childhood wheeze and asthma: a systematic review

Include

Exclude

All study designs

Reviews

Primary studies, including peer-reviewed and grey literature

Letters

All ethnicities

Not about prophylaxis

Population: Infants born early pre-term up to term, followed up for 1–10 years

Population: Infants with congenital heart defects or lung conditions such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Intervention: RSV prophylaxis with monoclonal antibody

Any other interventions such as RSV Prophylaxis or treatment with RSV-specific immune globulins, steroids, vaccines, macrolides etc.

Comparison: No prophylaxis or placebo

Comparison: Different dosing regimen of monoclonal antibody

Outcome: Recurrent wheeze or asthma development

Bronchiolitis caused by other allergens or viruses such as rhinovirus