Skip to main content

Table 1 Barriers and facilitators and participant numbers

From: A systematic review of the barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by philanthropists when determining which charities (including health charities or programmes) to fund

 

Quantitative study

N = 3254

Fidelity study [4]

Mixed methods studies

N = 923

Carrington study [2]—40 participants

Tillotson study [8]—500 participants + 383 professional services firms

Qualitative studies

N = 306

Breeze study [1]—60 participants

Kail Study [6]—9 participants

Ravenscroft Study [7]—13 participants

Van Poortvliet Study [9]—12 participants

David & Lucille Packard Study [3]—12 participants

Jones et al. [5]—200 participants

Difficulty accessing evidence

Studies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. 6, 7, 9

80% (n = 2604) expressed concerns that there was not sufficient relevant information to determine the credibility and trustworthiness of a non-profit or what the impact of their donation is.

n = 40

n = 306

Challenges in understanding the evidence

Studies 1, 2, 5, 7, 9

65% (n = 2115) did not know the impact of their funding.

N/A

n = 285

Insufficient resources

Studies 1, 2, 5, 7. 8, 9

N/A

n = 923

n = 285

Knowledge transfer and ease of access

Studies 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9

65% of (n = 2115) would give more if they had at least one insight into the impact of their giving.

n = 40

n = 246

Professional advisors

Studies 2, 6, 8

N/A

n = 923

n = 9

Broader definition of what counts as credible evidence and standardisation of reporting

Studies 2, 5, 7, 9

N/A

n = 40

n = 225