Skip to main content

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

From: Does suboptimal household flooring increase the risk of diarrhoea and intestinal parasite infection in low and middle income endemic settings? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Category

Included

Excluded

Population

Children and adults residing in low- and middle-income country (based upon World Bank country classification).

Children and adults residing in a high-income country (based upon World Bank country classification); livestock or pets

Intervention/exposure and comparator

Household flooring: unfinished or natural (earth, soil, sand, clay, mud, dung) versus finished (polished wood, tiles, cement, stone, bricks)

Confounders: unimproved drinking water (e.g. unprotected spring, well, or surface water) and/or sanitation (e.g. shared latrine, pit latrine without slab, hanging toilet or hanging latrine, flush/pour flush to elsewhere, bucket, no facilities, or bush or field), low socio-economic status

Studies not assessing household flooring type as an exposure

Study design

Quantitative studies including: randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, cohort, cross sectional, case-control

Qualitative studies (e.g. on process and perception of interventions); quantitative studies not measuring exposure or outcome status

Outcome

Diarrhoea and/or presence of intestinal parasites (soil-transmitted helminth or protozoa)

Secondary outcomes: diarrhoeal pathogen species (if laboratory confirmed) and/or intestinal parasite species (if laboratory confirmed)

Non-enteric infection or parasitism