Skip to main content

Table 1 Extracted data from the included studies

From: Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence

#

Name and year

Country

Study design

Analysis type

Intervention

Comparator/s

Perspective

Time horizon

Model type

CE measure

Intervention cost-effective?

1

Kunkle et al. (2015)

USA

Model based

CUA

Mid-urethral sling

Bulking agents

Healthcare system

1 year

Decision tree

Cost/QALY

No

2

Bargen et al. (2015)

USA

Model based

CUA

Mid-urethral sling

(1) Expectant management

Societal

Lifetime

Markov model

Cost/QALY

No

(2) Pelvic floor muscle exercise

(3) Pelvic floor muscle exercise

(4) Vaginal cone/biofeedback

(5) Incontinence pessary

3

Gupta et al. (2006)

UK

Model based

CUA

Duloxetine

(1) Pelvic floor muscle exercise

NR

2–5 years

Markov model

Cost/QALY

Yes

(2) Surgery

4

Jacklin et al. (2010)

UK

Model based

CUA

Tension-free vaginal tape

Duloxetine

Healthcare system

10 years

Markov model

Cost/QALY

Yes

5

Kilonzo et al. (2004)

UK

Model based

CUA

Tension-free vaginal tape

(1) Open colposuspension

Healthcare system

10 years

Markov model

Cost/QALY

Yes

(2) Laparoscopic colposuspension

(3) Traditional sub-urethral sling procedures

(4) Peri-urethral injection therapy

6

Laudano et al. (2013)

USA

Model based

CUA

Tension-free vaginal tape

Open Burch colposuspension

NR

10 years

Markov model

Cost/QALY

Yes

7

Oremus et al. (2003)

Canada

Model based

CEA

Collagen

(1) Retropubic suspension

Healthcare system

1 year

Decision tree

Cost/treated woman

No

(2) Transvaginal suspension

(3) Sling procedurea

8

Oremus et al. (2010)

Canada

Model based

CEA

Collagen

(1) Needle bladder neck suspension

Healthcare system

1 year

Decision tree

Cost/treated woman

Yes

(2) Burch colposuspension

(3) Slingsa

9

Richardson et al. (2014)

US

Model based

CUA

Mid-urethral sling

(1) Continence pessary

Third-party payer

1 year

Decision tree

Cost/QALY

Yes

(2) Pelvic floor muscle exercise

10

Sand et al. (2014)

Canada

Model based

CCA

Transurethral radiofrequency micro modelling

(1) Tension-free vaginal tape

Healthcare system

3 years

Markov model

Cost

Yes

(2) Trans-obturator tape

(3) Burch colposuspension

(4) Traditional bladder neck autologous sling

11

Seklehner et al. (2014)

US

Model based

CUA

Retropubic- Mid-urethral sling

Transobturator- Mid-urethral sling

Healthcare system

10 years

Markov model

Cost/QALY

No

12

Weber et al. (2000)

US

Model based

CCA

Burch colposuspension

Sling procedurea

NR

10 years

Decision tree

Costs and clinical outcomes

N/A

13

Wu et al. (2007)

US

Model based

CUA

Burch colposuspension

Tension-free vaginal tape

Healthcare system

10 years

Markov model

Cost/QALY

No

14

Boyers et al. 2013

UK

RCT

CUA

Single-incision mini-sling

Tension-free vaginal obturator

NHS

1 year

NA

Cost/QALY

Yes

15

Castañeda et al. 2014

Spain

Retrospective data analysis

CMA

Single-incision mini-sling

Tension-free vaginal obturator

Healthcare system

1 year

NA

NA

Yes

16

Costantini et al. 2014

Italy

RCT

CUA

Mid-urethral sling

(1) Pelvic floor muscle exercise

(2) Antimuscarinic treatment

National health service

3 months

NA

Cost/QALY

Yes

17

Dumville et al. 2006

UK

RCT

CUA

Laparoscopic colposuspension

Open colposuspension

NHS and PSS

6 and 24 months

NA

Cost/QALY

No

18

Hana et al. 2012

Bosnia and Hercegovina

Retrospective data analysis

CBA

Obturator tension-free vaginal tape

Vaginoplasty by Kelly

NR

6 months

NA

Cost/benefit

Yes

19

Lier et al. 2011

Canada

RCT

CUA

Trans-obturator tape

Tension-free vaginal tape

Public-payer

1 year

NA

Cost/QALY

Yes

20

Lier et al. 2016

Canada

RCT

CUA

Trans-obturator tape

Tension-free vaginal tape

Public-payer

5 years

NA

Cost/QALY

Cost/% of patients with no SAE

Yes

21

Manca et al. 2003

UK and Ireland

RCT

CUA

Tension-free vaginal tape

Open Burch colposuspension

NHS

6 months

NA

Cost/QALY

Yes

22

Montesino-Semper et al. 2013

Spain

Prospective

CUA

Sub-urethral slings and prolapse meshes

No treatment

Public health care system

1 year

NA

Cost/QALY

Cost /ICIQ-SF

Yes

23

Tiras et al. 2004

NR

Retrospective data analysis

CCA

Laparoscopic colposuspension extra peritoneal approach using mesh fixed with tacks

Laparoscopic colposuspension trans peritoneal approach using sutures

NR

25.7 months

NA

Cost

NA

24

VALPAS et al. 2006

Finland

RCT

CEA

Tension-free vaginal tape

Laparoscopic mesh colposuspension

Societal

1 year

NA

Cost/VAS

Cost/UISS

Yes

25

Loveridge et al. 1997

Australia

Retrospective data analysis

CCA

Laparoscopic colposuspension

Open colposuspension

NR

NA

NA

NA

NR

26

Kung et al. 1996

Canada

Retrospective data analysis

CEA

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension

Abdominal Burch colposuspension

Ministry of Health

1.2 - 2.7 years

NA

Cost/patient cured

NR

  1. CCA cost consequences analysis, CEA cost-effectiveness analysis, CUA cost-utility analysis, NA not applicable, NHS National Health System; NR not reported, PSS personal social services, QALY quality-adjusted life years, RCT randomised control trial, TOT trans-obturator tape, TVT tension-free vaginal tape, UISS: Urinary incontinence severity score, VAS visual analogue scale
  2. aNot specified the type of sling