Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection criteria

From: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telehealth in rural and remote emergency departments: a systematic review protocol

Parameter

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Population

Rural and remote populations being treated in ED

Rural and remote populations being treated outside of the emergency department

Intervention and comparator

Emergency telehealth vs. treatment as usual could be:

• Telephone vs. face to face consults

• Video conference vs. telephone consults

Descriptive studies without comparators

Study focused on a mobile device or electronic health records

Outcomes

Primary outcome: incremental cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, or disability adjusted life years avoided.

Secondary outcomes: health outcomes, costs, or both as reported by investigators of included studies.

Descriptive statistics without a well-defined effectiveness measure.

Study design

Full and partial economic evaluation

Qualitative research

Randomised controlled trials

Non-randomised controlled trials

Commentaries

Expert opinions

Government reports

Strategic documents

Single case reports