Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Systematic Reviews

Fig. 4

From: Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer

Fig. 4

Prioritization accuracy for Task 2 (final inclusion). This figure shows the percentage of articles screened by each tool to reach 100% of all articles included in the final report. Smaller bars indicate higher prioritization accuracy (as fewer articles had to be screened in order to achieve 100% sensitivity). The comparative performance of the two tools for each evidence report is displayed in gray (Abstrackr) and white (EPPI-Reviewer)

Back to article page