Skip to main content

Table 5 Multi-predictor model of high impact factor (> 5)

From: Journal impact factor, trial effect size, and methodological quality appear scantly related: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Potential predictors

Odds ratio (95% CI)

p value

Effect size (relative risk)

 

0.43

 0–0.5

2.48 (0.61, 10.1)

 

 0.5–1

Ref

 

 > 1

0.79 (0.32, 1.91)

 

Statistically significant

1.50 (0.47, 4.84)

0.50

Multicenter

1.34 (0.68, 2.62)

0.39

Medical domain

 

0.11

 Medicine

4.25 (0.82, 22.2)

 

 Obstetric

0.68 (0.06, 8.03)

 

 Pediatrics

0.99 (0.17, 5.71)

 

 Surgery

Ref

 

Industry funding

1.61 (0.71, 3.67)

0.26

Peer review funding

0.99 (0.38, 2.57)

0.99

Random sequence

1.58 (0.63, 3.93)

0.33

Allocation concealment, clearly adequate (A) or not (BCD)

0.53 (0.26, 1.08)

0.08

Double-blind

0.88 (0.21, 3.64)

0.86

Analysis as randomized

 

0.65

 Unclear

0.60 (0.17, 2.09)

 

 As treated

0.57 (0.18, 1.80)

 

 As randomized

Ref

 

Sample size (every 10 increase)

1.012 (0.997, 1.027)

0.12

Country

 

0.84

 Canada/USA

2.60 (0.11, 63.0)

 

 Europe

1.54 (0.06, 36.6)

 

 Asia

Ref

 

 Other

2.42 (0.07, 84.7)

 
  1. CI confidence interval