Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food security: protocol for a methodological study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Aug 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Nov 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Solange Durao|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Nov 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Nov 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Affengruber|
|21 Nov 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Lockwood|
|23 Dec 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Solange Durao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Dec 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Dec 2019||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jan 2020||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1268-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.