How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Apr 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bey-Marrie Schmidt|
|16 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ram Bajpai|
|17 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Roberta W. Scherer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Aug 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Roberta W. Scherer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Aug 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Oct 2019||Editorially accepted|
|7 Nov 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.