|
Author
|
Sample size (treatment group vs. control group)
|
Difference
|
95% CI
|
|---|
|
Liu et al. [64]
|
119 (60 vs. 59)
|
− 1.00 mmHg**
|
− 3.34 to 1.34
|
|
Mainenti et al. [65]
|
23 (11 vs. 12)
|
− 5.4 mmHg*
|
− 11.08 to 0.28
|
|
Monzani et al. [67]
|
20 (10 vs. 10)
|
3.80 mmHg*
|
− 2.42 to 10.02
|
|
Monzani et al. [68]
|
45 (23 vs. 22)
|
− 3.00 mmHg*
|
− 7.97 to 1.97
|
|
Nagasaki et al. [69]
|
95 (48 vs. 47)
|
− 0.10 mmHg**
|
− 4.22 to 4.02
|
|
Stott et al. [73]
|
638 (318 vs. 320)
|
− 0.1 mmHg*
|
− 1.5 to 1.3
|
|
Yazici et al. [76]
|
45 (23 vs. 22)
|
− 0.50 mmHg*
|
− 5.53 to 4.53
|
|
Zhao et al. [77]
|
369 (210 vs. 159)
|
− 0.13 mmHg*
|
− 2.42 to 2.16
|
- *Value is the difference in mean scores at final follow-up between treatment and control groups
- **Value is the difference in mean variation scores from baseline to follow-up between treatment and control group
