Risk of major bleeding during extended oral anticoagulation in patients with first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 May 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul|
|8 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Narothama Aeddula|
|9 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini|
|30 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Faizan Khan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Aug 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini|
|13 Aug 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Sep 2019||Editorially accepted|
|28 Oct 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1175-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.