An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Jan 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ram Bajpai|
|29 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio|
|3 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mathes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ram Bajpai|
|9 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio|
|18 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Mathes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2019||Editorially accepted|
|3 Sep 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1131-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.