Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of balanced versus unbalanced fluid resuscitation on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Sep 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Esbenshade
3 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charat Thongprayoon
8 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Narothama Aeddula
8 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini
8 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Anab Lehr
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charat Thongprayoon
9 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini
10 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Narothama Aeddula
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
5 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13643-019-1109-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement