Impact of balanced versus unbalanced fluid resuscitation on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Sep 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adam Esbenshade|
|3 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charat Thongprayoon|
|8 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Narothama Aeddula|
|8 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini|
|8 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Anab Lehr|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charat Thongprayoon|
|9 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini|
|10 Jul 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Narothama Aeddula|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|5 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1109-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.