Skip to main content

Table 7 Applicability of the evidence to LMICs

From: Communication around HPV vaccination for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping overview of systematic reviews

Review

Were some or all of the studies included in the systematic review conducted in LMICs or were the findings in the review consistent across settings or time periods and therefore suggest wide applicability? [Proportion of studies conducted in LMICs]

Are there important differences in on-the-ground realities and constraints in LMICs that might substantially alter the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention (where applicable) or raise questions about the applicability of the review findings?

Are there important differences in health system arrangements that may mean an intervention could not work in the same way in LMICs or review findings may not be applicable to LMICs?

Abdullahi et al., 2016 [39]

Yes [18/18]

Likely no

Largely not applicable

Badawy et al., 2017 [40]

No1

Likely yes

Yes

Ferrer et al., 2014 [41]2

No

Likely yes

Likely yes

Fu et al., 2014 [4]2

Yes [2/33]

Likely yes

Likely yes

Hendry et al., 2013 [42]

Yes [11/72]

Likely no

Likely no

Johnson et al., 2018 [43]

Yes [53/53]

Likely no

Likely no2

Kang et al., 2018 [44]

No

Likely yes

Likely yes

Kim et al., 2017 [45]

No

Likely no

Likely no

Newman et al., 2013 [46]

Yes [2/29]

Likely yes

Likely yes

Newman et al., 2018 [47]

Yes [6/79]

Likely no

Likely no

Radisic et al., 2017 [48]

No

Yes

Likely yes

Rambout et al., 2014 [49]3

No

Likely yes

Likely yes

  1. 1The review includes one study from a LMIC; however, this study does not focus on HPV
  2. 2Difficult to assess due to inadequate reporting of the results
  3. 3Did not intend to include studies from LMICs