Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Montgomery|
|3 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Apaydin|
|10 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - David Gough|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Apaydin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.