Mapping evidence of the concomitant management of schistosomiasis by traditional health practitioners and health care professionals in communities with high prevalent infections: a systematic scoping review protocol
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Nov 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Buyisile Chibi|
|25 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Robalino|
|26 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - AGANZE GLOIRE-AIME MUSHEBENGE|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Robalino|
|9 Mar 2019||Author responded||Author comments - AGANZE GLOIRE-AIME MUSHEBENGE|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Mar 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1088-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.