Pragmatic methods for reviewing exceptionally large bodies of evidence: systematic mapping review and overview of systematic reviews using lung cancer survival as an exemplar
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Dec 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Farmer|
|21 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ya Gao|
|20 Feb 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Ruth Lewis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Feb 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ya Gao|
|19 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Farmer|
|1 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Ruth Lewis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1087-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.