The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Feb 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini|
|22 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Farnoosh Abbas Aghababazadeh|
|23 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Abbasali Keshtkar|
|22 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Bram Duyx|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini|
|2 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Farnoosh Abbas Aghababazadeh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jun 2019||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-1082-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.