Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Feb 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini
22 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Farnoosh Abbas Aghababazadeh
23 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abbasali Keshtkar
22 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Bram Duyx
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tarun Bathini
2 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Farnoosh Abbas Aghababazadeh
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Jun 2019 Editorially accepted
17 Jul 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13643-019-1082-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement