Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Individual patient data network meta-analysis using either restricted mean survival time difference or hazard ratios: is there a difference? A case study on locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raphaël Porcher
4 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristina Charlotte Dietz
18 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Claire Petit
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raphaël Porcher
24 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Claire Petit
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
11 Mar 2019 Editorially accepted
15 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13643-019-0984-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement