Individual patient data network meta-analysis using either restricted mean survival time difference or hazard ratios: is there a difference? A case study on locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raphaël Porcher|
|4 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristina Charlotte Dietz|
|18 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Petit|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Feb 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raphaël Porcher|
|24 Feb 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Petit|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Feb 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Mar 2019||Editorially accepted|
|15 Apr 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-0984-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.