Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Nov 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joao Rodrigo Mesquita|
|30 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Passey|
|9 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serawit Deyno|
|10 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Mukumbang|
|10 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniela Melo|
|26 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Ingrid Eshun-Wilson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joao Rodrigo Mesquita|
|7 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Passey|
|10 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serawit Deyno|
|14 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Mukumbang|
|14 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniela Melo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|7 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-019-0960-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.