Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joao Rodrigo Mesquita
30 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Passey
9 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serawit Deyno
10 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Mukumbang
10 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniela Melo
26 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingrid Eshun-Wilson
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joao Rodrigo Mesquita
7 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Passey
10 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serawit Deyno
14 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ferdinand Mukumbang
14 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniela Melo
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
7 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13643-019-0960-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement