Skip to main content

Table 4 Qualitative description of metabolic syndrome subcomponents prevalence within included studies

From: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among HIV-positive and HIV-negative populations in sub-Saharan Africa—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author and publication year

Hypertension

Diabetes

Visceral obesity

High triglycerides

Low HDL cholesterol

HIV+

HIV−

HIV+

HIV−

HIV+

HIV−

HIV+

HIV−

HIV+

HIV−

1

Amusa et al., 2016 [33]

46.0% P < 0.01

5/50 (10.0%) P < 0.01

42/150 (28.0%) P < 0.01

2/50 (4.0%) P < 0.01

48/150 (32.0%) P 0.79

15/50 (30%) P 0.79 (P = 0.79)

NP

NP

NP

NP

2

Ayodele et al., 2012 [32]

82 (28.2%), P = 0.146

NP

54 (18.6%) P = 0.600

NP

56 (19.2%) P < 0.001

NP

38 (13.1%) P = 0.880

NP

159 (54.6) P = 0.013

NP

3

Berhane et al., 2012 [34]

110/313 (35.1%)

NP

78/313 (24.9%)

 

43/313 (13.7%)

 

83/31 (26.5%)

  

NP

4

Tesfaye et al., 2014 [42]

SBP = 39/374

DBP = 33/374

NP

103

NP

NP

NP

154

NP

248

NP

5

Sobieszczyk et al., 2016 [29]

NP

NP

(0.7 to 1.9%) P = 0.346

 

33.5 to 44.3% (P = 0.060)

 

9.4 to 13.3%,

P = 0.112

 

56.6 to 61.0%, P = 0.283

 

6

Obirikorang et al., 2016 [41]

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

7

Ngatchou et al., 2013 [40]

NP

NP

26%

P < 0.01

1%

P < 0.01

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

8

Fourie et al., 2010 [35]

50.0% P = 0.03

59.0% P = 0.03

ATP III

22.7% P = 0.49

IDF

36.6% P = 0.08

ATP III

25.1% P = 0.49

IDF

43.7% P = 0.08

ATP III

Male—0.9% P = 0.32

Female—18.3%

P = 0.93

IDF

Male—2.6% P = 0.31

Female—33.9% P - 0.22 (P = 0.22)

ATP III

Male—0.0%

P - 0.32 (P = 0.32)

Female—18.7% P - 0.93 (P = 0.93)

IDF

Male—0.9%

P - 0.31 (P = 0.31)

Female—40.1% P - 0.22 (P = 0.22)

ATP III

18.2% P = 0.19

IDF

14.3% P = 0.19

ATP III

17.6% P = 0.28

IDF

14.3% P = 0.28

ATP III

Male—47.4%, Female—62.6%

P < 0.0001

IDF

Male—46.5%

P < 0.0001

Female—62.6%

P < 0.0001

ATP III

Male—12.1%

P < 0.0001

Female—33.7% P < 0.0001

IDF

Male—11.2% P < 0.0001

Female—33.7% P < 0.0001

9

Muhammad et al., 2013 [45]

9.5 (P < 0.001).

NP

3 (P = 1.0)

NP

NP

NP

16

 

68.5%

 

10

Mbunkah et al., 2014 [38]

24.7%

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

11

Guehi et al., 2016 [30]

37 (4.9%)

NP

4 (0.5%)

NP

128 (17.0%)

NP

128 (17.0%)

NP

NP

NP

12

Mashinya et al., 2015 [37]

56 (26.2%)

NP

10 (4.7%)

NP

NP

NP

Male = 35.0 vs female = 12.5%, P = 0.001)

 

91 (43.8%)

 

13

Guira et al., 2016 [31]

36 (66.7%)

NP

16 (29.6%)

   

27 (50%)

 

37 (68.5%)

 

14

Hirigo et al., 2016 [36]

18/185

P = 0.84

NP

IDF criteria 58 (31.3%)

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

15

Zannou et al., 2009 [28]

29 (42.6)

 

6 (7.6%)

 

24 (33.3%)

NP

10 (14.1%)

NP

NP

NP

16

Muyanja et al., 2016 [39]

13 (5.2%) P = 0.46

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

74 (29.6%) 0.76

NP

214 (85.6%) 0.16

NP

17

Adébayo et al., 2015 [44]*

60 (24.6%)

5 (10%), P < 0.01

5 (2.04%)

2 (4.0%)

NP

NP

44 (18.0%)

Male—12 (12.6%)

Female—26 (13.3%)

NP

NP

NP

18

Sawadogo et al., 2005 [43]*

NP

NP

1.3%, CI (0.5–3.0)

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

NP

  1. *French publication