Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Jul 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ross Atkinson|
|10 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jorge Acosta-Reyes|
|23 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Francesca Wuytack|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jorge Acosta-Reyes|
|7 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ross Atkinson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Dec 2018||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jan 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-018-0924-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.