The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valerie Smith|
|19 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Pollock|
|26 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Pollock|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Pollock|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Dec 2018||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jan 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13643-018-0914-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.