Skip to main content

Table 4 Rater agreement

From: Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis

No difference between the raters Number of items
121 132
Percent agreement 91.7%
  1. In order to assess rater agreement between two groups of raters, we first compiled the primary results (rated by the research coordinator and research assistants) into one group, and all the 10% double-screening results into another group. The percentage agreement between the two groups was 91.7%. Agreement between raters can be related to the initial practice screening at the very early stage, and the frequent team meetings that were regularly conducted to discuss all uncertainties that accumulated throughout the screening process