Skip to main content

Table 5 Key characteristics of ‘green’ systematic reviews

From: Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review

Review

Geographical location

Type of paper

Review aim/focus

Focus of review*

Type of evidence synthesised**

Bayliss et al. [29]

Europe (UK, Sweden, Estonia, Romania)

Description of methods of involvement (describes results of questionnaire-based evaluation of the involvement)

Qualitative meta-synthesis; perceptions of predictive testing for those at risk of developing a chronic inflammatory disease

XIII Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Qualitative

Boelens et al. [30]

Europe

Description of methods of involvement (describes the consensus process to develop statements and recommendations to include in a patient summary)

Patient summary of consensus for colon and rectal cancer care

II Neoplasms

Unclear

Bond et al. [53]

Australia

Report of a guideline/recommendation

Guidelines; assisting Australians with mental health problems and financial difficulties.

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Mixed

Braye and Preston-Shoot [31]

UK

Description of methods of involvement (researcher’s experiences of involving stakeholders)

Systematic review; learning, teaching and assessment of law in social work education

Other

Mixed

Bunn et al. [32]

UK

Description of methods of involvement (method to contextualise findings of a review)

Systematic review of qualitative studies; patient and carer experiences of diagnosis and treatment of dementia

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Qualitative

Concannon et al. [42]

USA

Systematic review

Systematic review; methods of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research and patient-centred outcomes research

Research

Mixed

Coon et al. [63]

UK

Description of methods of involvement (describe and discuss methods of involvement in 4 reviews)

Four systematic reviews; nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD used in school settings

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Mixed

Edwards et al. [43]

UK

Systematic review

Identification, assessment and management of risk in young people with complex mental health needs entering, using and exiting inpatient child and adolescent mental health services in the UK

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Mixed

Harris et al. [25]

UK

Description of methods of involvement (describe and discuss methods of involvement in a realist review)

Realist review; community-based peer support

ICHI Functioning intervention

Mixed

Hayden et al. [44]

Canada

Systematic review

Rapid knowledge synthesis; Collaborative Emergency Centres (CECs)

XXI Factors influencing health status and contact with health services

Unclear

Higginson et al. [45]

UK

Systematic review

Systematic review; design and conduct of research on end of life care (EoLC)

XXI Factors influencing health status and contact with health services

Mixed

Hyde et al. [34]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review and narrative synthesis; factors affecting shared decision-making around prescribing analgesia for musculoskeletal pain in primary care consultations

XIII Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Mixed

Jamal et al. [35]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review; effects of schools and school environment interventions on children and young people’s health

XXI Factors influencing health status and contact with health services

Mixed

Liabo [46]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review; effectiveness of interventions that aim to support looked after children in school

XXI Factors influencing health status and contact with health services

Mixed

Liu et al. [47]

UK

Systematic review

Mixed-methods systematic review; to identify, appraise and interpret research on the approaches employed to maximise the cross-cultural appropriateness and effectiveness of health promotion interventions for smoking cessation, increasing physical activity and improving healthy eating for African-, Chinese- and South Asian-origin populations

ICHI Public health intervention

Mixed

Martin et al. [36]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review; attitudes and preferences toward population screening for dementia

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Mixed

McConachie et al. [48]

UK

Systematic review

Systematic review; measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) up to the age of 6 years

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Quantitative

McCusker et al. [49]

Canada

Systematic review

Systematic review; collaborative mental health care for depression

V Mental and behavioural disorders

Mixed

McGinn et al. [56]

Canada

Systematic review

Systematic review; users’ perspectives of the factors influencing electronic health record (EHR) implementation

XXI Factors influencing health status and contact with health services

Quantitative

Morgan et al. [58]

UK

Systematic review

Systematic review (quantitative and qualitative evidence); incentive mechanisms of action for smoking cessation in pregnancy and breastfeeding

XV Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium

Mixed

Oliver et al. [37] (‘correlational’ review)

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review of observational studies (a ‘correlational’ review); to explore the quantitative relationship between childhood obesity and educational attainment

ICHI Public health intervention

Quantitative

Oliver et al. [37] (‘views’ review)

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review of interview-based and questionnaire-based research (‘views review’); children’s perspectives of body size

ICHI Public health intervention

Qualitative

Oosterkamp et al. [54]

Netherlands

Report of a guideline/recommendation

Systematic review; strategies to prevent WSL (white spot lesions) during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

XI Diseases of the digestive system

Quantitative

Pearson et al. [50]

UK

Systematic review (description of involvement in supplementary file)

Realist review; conditions and actions which lead to the successful implementation of health promotion programmes in schools

ICHI Public health intervention

Mixed

Pollock et al. [38]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Cochrane review; physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility in people with stroke

IX Diseases of the circulatory system

Quantitative

Rees et al. [51]

UK

Systematic review

Systematic review; barriers to, or facilitators of, HIV-related sexual health for men who have sex with men (MSM) and MSM’s perceptions and experiences of sexual health in the light of HIV

I Certain infectious and parasitic diseases

Mixed

Saan et al. [55] (review 1)

Netherlands

Other (development of reporting tool)

Qualitative evidence synthesis; needs of victims of crime with regard to helpful and unhelpful reactions of their social network including volunteer services

Other

Qualitative

Saan et al. [55] (review 2)

Netherlands

Other (development of reporting tool)

Systematic review; concepts, determinants and outcome measures used to evaluate self-management support

Other

Unclear

Serrano-Anguilar et al. [39]

Spain

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review; effectiveness and safety of treatment alternatives for patients with degenerative ataxias (DA)

VI Diseases of the nervous system

Unclear

Smith et al. [52]

UK

Systematic review

‘Multi-methods review’; service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research

Research

Mixed

Stewart and Oliver [40]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Systematic review of reviews; communication with parents about newborn bloodspot screening

XV Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium

Mixed

Vale et al. [41]

UK

Description of methods of involvement

Cochrane review; chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer

II Neoplasms

Quantitative

  1. Note that within this table there are 32 reviews described, as 2 of the 30 included papers describe 2 reviews, and data has been extracted separately for these at this stage (Oliver et al. [37] ‘correlational’ review and ‘views’ review; Saan et al. [55] review 1 and review 2)
  2. *Focus of review categorised as either: Health/disease of focus according to ICD-10 categories; OR, if review was not focused on a specific health topic/disease, then review was categorised as either: Medical or surgical intervention, Public health intervention, Functioning intervention, Research, or Other
  3. **Type of evidence synthesised categorised as qualitative, quantitative, mixed (i.e. both qualitative and quantitative) or unclear