Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The effect of carbetocin compared to misoprostol in management of the third stage of labor and prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Grillo-Ardila
28 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Parry-Smith
2 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hernando Gaitan
10 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mohamed A Abd El Aziz
Resubmission - Version 2
10 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Parry-Smith
5 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos Grillo-Ardila
24 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mohamed A Abd El Aziz
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mohamed A Abd El Aziz
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-018-0832-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement