Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of identified publications

From: The effectiveness of attentional bias modification for substance use disorder symptoms in adults: a systematic review

Authors, year

Study

Participants

ABM intervention

Outcomes

Findings

 

Design; country

Characteristics

Substance use disorder

N

Gender; mean age

Method

Amount of sessions

Duration

AB measure

Symptom measures

 

Attwood et al., 2008 [21]

Randomised trial; 2 groups (attend and avoid); UK

Current smokers, smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day

Nicotine

54

56% male; 22

Modified visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

1

–

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

FTND; QSU-Brief

AB at baseline; sig. changes of AB in avoid group; sig. difference in subjective craving between attend and avoid group in males only

Begh et al., 2015 [22]

Double-blind randomised controlled trial; 2 groups (ABM and placebo); UK

Current smokers, smoking at least 10 cigarettes a day

Nicotine

118

–; 45

Modified visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

5

5 weeks

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms); pictorial Stroop task

MPSS-C; abstinence; time until relapse

No AB at baseline; no sig. changes of AB; no difference between groups in craving; abstinence and time until relapse

Charles et al., 2015 [37]

Non-randomised trial; 4 groups (patient and healthy controls, both assigned to either ABM or placebo); UK

Opiate users in treatment prescribed a substitute medication; healthy controls

Opiate

44

Mainly male; 38–45 (reported per group)

Modified visual probe task (pictures)

1

Unclear

Visual probe task (pictures; 200, 500 ms)

Subjective craving (3 VAS scales)

No AB at baseline; no sig. effect on AB or craving

Cox et al., 2015 [35]

Randomised trial; 4 groups (ABM, motivational intervention, ABM + motivational intervention, control group); UK

Adults drinking above the UK Department of Health cut-off of healthy drinking

Alcohol

148

49% male; 29

Alcohol Attention-Control Training Programme (pictures)

4

4 weeks

Alcohol Stroop task (words)

DRQ; SIP; RTCQ

AB at baseline and changes of AB not reported; alcohol consumption reduced in ABM group

Elfeddali et al., 2016 [23]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and placebo); Netherlands

Adults smoking on daily basis for at least 1 year

Nicotine

434

31% male; 41

Modified visual probe task (web-based; pictures; 500 ms)

6

Within 2 weeks

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

FTND; craving; intention to quit smoking

AB at baseline; no sig. changes of AB; effects on abstinence in subsample of heavy smokers

Fadardi and Cox, 2009 [13]

Non-randomised trial with 3 groups (social drinkers, harmful drinkers, hazardous drinkers); UK

Social, hazardous, and harmful adult drinkers

Alcohol

40; 68; 92

14% male, 28% male, 87% male; 30, 23, 41

Alcohol Attention-Control Training Programme (pictures)

0; 2; 4

4 weeks

Alcohol Stroop task (words)

RTCQ; TAAD; SIP

AB at baseline (larger in harmful and hazardous drinkers than in social drinkers); sig. changes of AB in harmful and hazardous drinkers; harmful drinkers showed reduced alcohol consumption and increased readiness to change

Field and Eastwood, 2005 [24]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (attend and avoid); UK

Adult heavy drinkers, drinking at least 14 units (women) or 21 units (men) of alcohol per week on average

Alcohol

40

50% male; 22

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

1

–

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

AUDIT; DAQ; craving (pre/post training); taste test

No AB at baselinea; sig. changes of AB in avoid group; no effects on urge to drink and desire for alcohol; attend group consumed more alcohol than avoid group in taste test

Field et al., 2007 [33]

Randomised trial with 3 groups (attend, avoid, and control); UK

Adults drinking above the UK Department of Health ‘safe’ cut-off of healthy drinking

Alcohol

60

43% male, 43% male, 67% male; 22, 22, 26

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

1

–

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms); alcohol Stroop task (words)

Alcohol use disorders identification test; DAQ; urge to drink; taste test

No AB at baseline; sig. changes of AB in avoid group without generalisation to new stimuli and different task; no group difference in alcohol consumption, urge to drink, and consumption of beer in taste test

Kerst and Waters, 2014 [25]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and control group); US

Current smokers, smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day for the past 2 years

Nicotine

60

50% male; 43

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

21 (3 each day for 7 days)

1 week

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

QSU; craving; cigarettes smoked per day; physical measures

AB at baseline; sig. changes of AB in ABM group; no effect on smoking behaviour; sig. effect on cued craving but not on non-cued craving in ABM group

Lee and Lee, 2015 [26]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and psychoeducation); South Korea

Adult problem drinkers as identified with the AUDIT

Alcohol

43

40% male; 22

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 ms)

 

–

Free-viewing task with eye-tracker (pictures; 1000 ms)

Consumed alcohol during last month; AAAQ; AUDIT; RTCQ

AB at baseline; sig. changes of AB in ABM group; no effect on readiness to change

Lopes et al., 2014 [34]

Randomised trial with 3 groups (3 sessions ABM, 1 session ABM and placebo); Brazil

Adult smokers from a smoking cessation programme, smoking at least 5 cigarettes a day

Nicotine

67

65% male; 45

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 50, 500, and 2000 ms)

1 or 3

2 weeks

Visual probe task (pictures; 50, 500, 2000 ms)

FTND; level of carbon monoxide; Smoking Urge-Brief

AB at baseline; sig. changes of AB in all groups after 24 h; reduction of AB maintained for 6 months after 3 sessions of ABM; no effect on craving and number of smoked cigarettes

Mayer et al., 2016 [27]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and placebo); US

Treatment-seeking adults diagnosed with cocaine use disorder used in at least 4 of prior 30 days

Opiate

40

63% male; 38

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 200, 500 ms)

5

4 weeks

Visual probe task (pictures; 200, 500 ms)

Cocaine use; CCQ-G; CSSA; FTND; BIS; AUDIT; BDI-2; STAI-T

No AB at baseline; no sig. changes of AB; no effect on craving, or drug use behaviour

McGeary et al., 2014 [28]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and placebo); US

Heavy drinking students as identified with the AUDIT

Alcohol

41

100% male; 19

Modified dot probe task with words (500 ms)

8

4 weeks

Not assessed

DHQ

No AB at baseline reported an no changes in AB assessed; reduced amount of alcohol consumption in ABM group

McHugh et al., 2010 [29]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and placebo); US

Adult smokers, smoking at least 10 cigarettes a day

Nicotine

64

65% male; 38

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

1

–

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

FTND; TLFB; QSU-Brief

No AB at baseline; no sig. changes of AB; no effect on craving

Schoenmakers et al., 2007 [30]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and placebo); Netherlands

Heavy drinking students as identified with a self-report questionnaire

Alcohol

106

100% male; 21

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 500 ms)

1

–

Visual probe task (pictures; 500 ms); flicker task

Preference test; craving

No AB at baselinea; smaller AB in ABM group compared with control group at post-test without generalisation; no effect on craving and preference test

Schoenmakers et al., 2010 [31]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM and placebo); Netherlands

Adults diagnosed with alcohol dependence

Alcohol

43

77% male; 45

Modified dot probe task (pictures; 200, 500 ms)

5

3 weeks

Visual probe task (pictures; 200, 500 ms)

DAQ; Time to relapse

No AB at baselinea; sig. changes of AB in ABM group; no effect on craving, but time until relapse longer in ABM group

Wiers et al., 2015 [36]

Randomised trial with 5 groups (4 experimental conditions and one placebo group); Netherlands

Heavy drinking adults as identified with the AUDIT

Alcohol

314

-; 48

Alcohol Attention Control Training Programme

4

2–14 days

–

Alcohol consumption; craving; RCQ

No AB at baseline and changes in AB assessed; reduction of drinking and craving, but this was found in all conditions including control group

Ziaee et al., 2016 [32]

Randomised trial with 2 groups (ABM + TAU and TAU only); Iran

Adults undergoing methadone maintenance therapy

Opiate

48

100%; 33 in experimental group, 39 in control group

Drug attention control training (words and pictures)

3

2 weeks

Drug-Stroop task (words)

SCQ; RTCQ; PSS; Persian drug temptation questionnaire

No AB at baseline reported; sig. changes of AB in ABM group; decreased doses of medicine and number of lapses and increase in readiness to change in ABM group

  1. aBased on calculations from data derived from tables or figures (see supporting information)