Skip to main content

Table 5 Determinants of catastrophic health expenditure

From: Understanding variations in catastrophic health expenditure, its underlying determinants and impoverishment in Sub-Saharan African countries: a scoping review

No.

Author

County

Health area

Determinants

Household economic status

Type of health provider

Type of illness

Household member characteristics

Geographical location

Social insurance/health scheme

Household size and composition

1

(Xu et al. 2006 [47, 48])

Kenya

General health care

Higher income (−)

Public facilities (+)

inpatient services (+)

Reported Illness (+)

Employment (−)

Education (−)

Urban area (−)

Health insurance (NS)

Under 5 (−)

2

(Laokri et al. 2014 [40])

Benin

TB

Lower quintile (+)

NA

Adverse pre-diagnosis (+)

Education (+)

gender(NS)

NA

Poor social network (+)

health insurance (+)

Small household (+)

above 40 years (+)

3

(Barasa et al. 2017 [52])

Kenya

General health care

Poorest quintile (+)

NA

Chronic disease (+)

Unemployed (+)

Marginalised location (+)

NA

Older HH head (+)

large HH size (+)

4

(Buigut et al. 2015 [53])

Kenya

General health care

NA

Public hospital (+)

Injury (+)

simple illness, e.g. cough (−)

Working adults (−)

Slums (+)

Safety net (−)

Older income earner above 55 years (+)

5

(Su et al. 2006 [44])

Burkina Faso

General health care

Higher quintile (NS)

NA

illness episodes (+)

chronic illness (+)

disabled (NS)

NA

NA

NA

HH size (+)

6

(Sene and Cisse, 2015 [30])

Senegal

General health care

NA

Health centre/posts (+)

Accidents (+)

NA

Rural areas (+)

Health insurance (−)

Elderly members (+)

7

(Dyer et al. 2013 [45])

South Africa

HIV-ART

Poorest quintile (+)

NA

Pre-ART treatment (−)

Education level (+)

employment (−)

age (NS)

NA

Medical scheme (NS)

Larger HHs (−)

8

(Brinda et al. 2014 [51])

Tanzania

General health care

Low socio-economic (+)

low HH asset (+)

Traditional healer (+)

Chronic disease (+)

Manual labourer (+)

NA

NA

HH size above 5 (+)

9

Masiye et al., 2016 [49])

Zambia

General health care

Rich wealth quintile (−)

Primary health care facility (−)

NA

Education attainment (NS)

employment status (NS)

sex (NS)

Distance to health facility (+)

region of residence (NS)

NA

NA

10

(Arsenault et al. 2013 [55])

Mali

Obstetric care

Poorest (+)

NA

NA

No education (+)

Remote community (+)

40 KM away from health facility (+)

NA

NA

11

(Akinkugbe et al. 2012 [16])

Botswana, Lesotho

General health care

NA

NA

NA

Unemployed HH head (+)

female headed HHs (−)

educated head (−)

Rural areas (+)

NA

HH size (+)

HH member above 65 years (+)

12

(Ukwaja et al. 2013 [46, 50])

Nigeria

TB

NA

Private facility (−)

HIV positive status (+)

TB smear positive (+)

Formal education (+)

primary income earner (+)

Urban residence (−)

NA

Above 40 years (+)

13

(Ilunga-Ilunga et al. 2015 [39])

Democratic Republic of Congo

Malaria

Poor and Middle income (+)

Private hospital (+)

Clinical Malaria (+)

Female headed HHs (+)

NA

NA

NA

14

(Adisa, 2015 [43])

Nigeria

General health care

Higher income (−)

NA

NA

Educated (+)

female age (+)

NA

Informal health financing (−)

non-enrolment in insurance (+)

NA

15

(Cleary et al. 2013 [56])

South Africa

Obstetric care/TB/ART

NA

NA

Obstetrics patients (+)

Employment (−)

education (+)

Urban areas (−)

NA

NA

16

(Counts and Skordis-Worrall, 2016 [70])

Tanzania

Chronic disease

NA

NA

NA

Education level (+)

male HH head (−)

Urban areas (+)

NA

HH size (+)

number of adults (+)

17

(Beaulière et al. 2010 [54])

Côte d’Ivoire

HIV-ART

Higher income (−)

NA

Time spent on ART (−)

Education level (−)

female HIV patients (−)

NA

Health insurance (NS)

HH size (−)

18

(Xu et al. 2006a [47])

Uganda

General health care

HH income (NS)

Private facilities (+)

NA

Low education (+)

male HHs (−)

Urban areas (−)

NA

HH with over 65 yrs. (+)

  1. HH Household, NA not applicable, NS not significant, (−) decreasing odds/likelihood, (+) increasing odd/likelihood