Skip to main content

Table 1 Important criteria when considering data from clinical study reports and/or other regulatory data

From: The use of clinical study reports to enhance the quality of systematic reviews: a survey of systematic review authors

Criteria

Description of criteria

1

Monetary cost of the intervention on the healthcare budget (i.e. considering both the price of a course and the number of people in the population that are beingā€”or will beā€”treated)

2

Burden of disease of the indication this product is meant to treat/prevent

3

How many people are using or likely to use this product?

4

Product new to the market?

5

Product from a new drug class or has a new mechanism of action

6

Has important interactions with other drugs (e.g. drug-drug interactions)

7

High proportion of RCTs evaluating this product are industry funded

8

Prominent claims of safety and/or efficacy advantage of this product over currently available treatments

9

High degree of media attention surrounding this product

10

High proportion of trials of this product are unpublished

11

Post-marketing surveillance has identified safety concerns?

12

Important or standard outcome measures (also known as ā€˜endpointsā€™) have not been published

13

Concerns regarding a lack of published data on potential harms of the product

14

Marketing authorisation based on surrogate outcomes (rather than clinical outcomes)

15

When protocol(s) are publicly available

16

When statistical analysis plan(s) publicly available

17

Known errors or concerns about trial publications of this product

18

Important discrepancies between the journal publication and the trial registry entry?