Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of bias of included studies

From: Interventions for improving pharmacist-led patient counselling in the community setting: a systematic review

Study (year)

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Was the study adequately protected against contamination?

Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed?

Was baseline outcome measurement similar?

Was baseline characteristics similar?

Was the study free from selective outcome reporting?

Overall riska

 1. Basheti (2009)

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

 2. Chalker (2005)

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 3. Chuc (2002)

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 4. de Almeida Neto (2000)

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 5. de Almeida Neto (2000)

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 6. Dolovich (2007)

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

 7. Garcia (1998)

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 8. Garcia (2003)

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 9. Kimberlin (1993)

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

 10. Lalonde (2008)

Low

Low

Low

High

Low

Low

High

Low

High

 11. Mayer (1998)

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

 12. Patwardhan (2012)

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

 13. Prokhorov (2010)

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

 14. Reeves (2007)

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

High

 15. Sigrist (2002)

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

High

 16. Sinclair (1998)

High

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

 17. Watson (2002)

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

  1. aKey for overall assessment of bias within a study; if low of bias for all key domains (low of bias); if unclear risk of bias for one or more key domains (unclear risk of bias); if high of bias for one or more key domains (high of bias)