Skip to main content

Table 1 Methods employed across projects assessing utility of ClinicalTrials.gov searches in ongoing systematic reviews

From: Does information from ClinicalTrials.gov increase transparency and reduce bias? Results from a five-report case series

Protocol element

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Infertility

Omega-3 and CVD

Mental health

Tympanostomy tubes

Search ClinicalTrials.gov using terms adapted from the systematic review

x

x

x Also searched ICTRP

x

x Also searched ICTRP

Screened records using same criteria as systematic review

x

x

x

x

x

Data Extraction from ClinicalTrials.gov

x

x

x

x

x

Compared records to publications

x

x

x

x Also emailed authors

x

 Population

x

x

x

x

x

 Intervention

x

x

x

x

x

 Outcome definition

x

x

x

x

x

 Population baselines

x

x

x

x

x

 Results

x

x

x

x

x

 Risk of bias

  

x

 

x

When there was only a ClinicalTrials.gov record

     

 Recruitment status (as listed in ClinicalTrials.gov)

x

x

x

x

x

 Dates* (study start and completion dates)

x

x

x

x

x

 Results reported in ClinicalTrials.gov

x

x

x

No studies with results reported only in records

x

 Re-analyzed ongoing review with new results

x

No records had usable results

No records had usable results

The systematic review did not have quantitative analyses

No records had usable results

 Country (site information in ClinicalTrials.gov)

  

x

 

x

  1. *Extracted dates from ClincialTrials.gov records to establish how many are more than 3 years old