Skip to main content

Table 1 Variables that will be extracted from non-Cochrane registration records

From: Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol

Protocol section

Variables

Title, objectives

Focus of review

Common ICD-10 code

Number of included studies

Total number of participants

Type of interventions

Meta-analysis included

Network meta-analysis included

Economic evaluation included

Use of terms “systematic reviews” or “meta-analysis” in title of abstract

SR registration (e.g., PROSPERO) mentioned

SR protocol mentioned

Reporting guideline (e.g., PRISMA) mentioned

Cochrane methods used

Eligibility criteria

Based on study design

Based on publication status

Based on language of report

Search methods

Number of databases searched

Years of coverage reported

Search terms reported

Trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov) searched

Number of other sources searches

Other sources searched

Screening, extraction, and risk of bias assessment methods

Screening method

Data extraction method

Study risk of bias/quality formally assessed

Study risk of bias/quality assessment method

Study risk of bias/quality assessment tool used

Study risk of bias/quality assessment incorporated into meta-analysis

Included/excluded studies and participants

Review flow reported

Reason for exclusion of full-text articles reported

Gray literature (e.g., conference abstracts) included

Outcomes

Number of outcomes stated

Primary outcome stated

Type of primary outcome

Statistical significance of intervention

Direction of the effect

Statistical methods

Meta-analysis performed

Meta-analysis model used

Statistical heterogeneity investigated

Heterogeneity statistic inappropriately guided choice of meta-analysis model (e.g., random effects model selected if I2 > 50%) investigated

Possibility of publication bias discussed/considered in results, discussion, or conclusion

Subgroup analysis performed

Sensitivity analysis performed

Meta-regression performed

Network meta-analysis performed

Limitations, conclusions, COIs, and funding

GRADE assessment reported in a summary of findings table or text

Limitations reported

Study risk of bias/quality/limitations incorporated into therapeutic SR abstract conclusions

COIs reported

Source of funding of the SR