Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Digital storytelling as a method in health research: a systematic review protocol

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Solange Durao
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Xanthopoulou
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reuben Ayeleke
7 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Eastwood
17 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Hilfiker
19 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kendra Rieger
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Eastwood
3 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Xanthopoulou
5 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Hilfiker
5 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reuben Ayeleke
19 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kendra Rieger
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reuben Ayeleke
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-018-0704-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement