Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Anxiety and the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa: protocol for a systematic review

Systematic Reviews20187:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0685-x

Received: 11 August 2017

Accepted: 15 January 2018

Published: 24 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrike Schulze
13 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sahib Khalsa
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Caitlin Lloyd
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sahib Khalsa
1 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrike Schulze
21 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Caitlin Lloyd
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sahib Khalsa
12 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrike Schulze
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
24 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-018-0685-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
(2)
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK

Advertisement