Skip to content

Advertisement

Systematic Reviews

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Response to ‘Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms’

Systematic Reviews20187:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0677-x

Received: 5 September 2017

Accepted: 10 January 2018

Published: 25 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sean Grant
28 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jens Jap
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sean Grant
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
25 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-018-0677-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center of Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, USA
(2)
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

Advertisement