Response to ‘Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms’
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sean Grant|
|28 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jens Jap|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sean Grant|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13643-018-0677-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.