This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Response to ‘Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms’
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 5 September 2017
Accepted: 10 January 2018
Published: 25 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sean Grant|
|28 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jens Jap|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sean Grant|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13643-018-0677-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.