Skip to content


Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
23 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsty Loudon
23 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michaela Brown
23 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tolulope Sajobi
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0668-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.