Skip to main content

Table 3 Types of evidence available in meta-research studies (n = 100) evaluating the PRISMA Statement or extensions

From: Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Type of evidence available

Frequency of studies

SR adherence to the PRISMA Statement or extensions

 Data on SR adherence to the PRISMA Statement [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]

57

 Data on SR adherence to a particular item of the PRISMA Statement (e.g. searching item, risk of bias assessment item) [95,96,97,98,99]

5

 Data on SR abstract adherence to the PRISMA-Abstracts extension [74, 100, 101]

3

 Data on network meta-analysis adherence to the PRISMA-Network Meta-Analysis extension [102]

1

 Data on rapid review adherence to the PRISMA Statement [103]

1

 Data on SR adherence to draft versions of the PRISMA-Child and PRISMA-Protocols Child extensions [104]

1

 Data on SR adherence to reporting standards derived from the PRISMA Statement [8, 105, 106]

3

 Data on SR abstract adherence to items derived from the PRISMA Statement [107, 108]

2

 Data on individual participant data meta-analysis adherence to items derived from the PRISMA Statement [109]

1

Characteristics associated with SR adherence to the PRISMA Statement

 Association between journal endorsement of the PRISMA Statement and SR adherence to PRISMA [38, 39, 46, 71, 77, 81, 84, 94]

8

 Association between factors other than journal endorsement (e.g. type of journal, word count, year of publication) and SR adherence to PRISMA [38, 43, 44, 46,47,48,49,50,51, 54, 57,58,59,60,61,62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73,74,75, 77, 78, 80, 82,83,84,85,86, 88,89,90, 92, 94]

37

Mention of the PRISMA Statement or extensions in journal instructions

 Frequency of journals referring to the PRISMA Statement or extensions in the instructions to authors [46, 71, 77, 81, 84, 110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122]

18

 Frequency of journals referring to the PRISMA Statement or extensions in the instructions to peer reviewers [112, 123]

2

Other

 Frequency of SR authors who reported using the PRISMA Statement to guide reporting [8, 71, 114, 115, 124]

5

 Frequency of editors who are aware of the PRISMA Statement [111]

1

 Frequency of inappropriate citation of the PRISMA Statement by authors [125]

1

 Association between adherence to the PRISMA Statement and citation of SRs [126]

1

 Authors’ perceived barriers and facilitators to use of the PRISMA-Equity extension [127]

1

 Authors’ views on what items are most important to report in SRs [128,129,130]

3

 Systematic reviews of meta-research studies evaluating some component of the PRISMA Statement or extensions [35,36,37, 131]

4