Skip to content

Advertisement

Systematic Reviews

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

Systematic Reviews20176:263

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8

Received: 2 October 2017

Accepted: 8 December 2017

Published: 19 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anirudha Agnihotry
5 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernd Arents
6 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Winchester
28 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Page
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
8 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
(2)
Centre for Journalology and Canadian EQUATOR Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
(3)
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Advertisement