This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 October 2017
Accepted: 8 December 2017
Published: 19 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anirudha Agnihotry|
|5 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernd Arents|
|6 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Winchester|
|28 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Matthew Page|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.