This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 May 2017
Accepted: 6 December 2017
Published: 19 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Clark|
|30 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zack Marshall|
|6 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Marcel Mertz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zack Marshall|
|26 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Clark|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0661-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.