This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Prevalence, predictors and adverse outcomes of adolescent pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 August 2017
Accepted: 28 November 2017
Published: 6 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Tanner-Smith|
|24 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mihiretu Kebede|
|5 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Henning|
|13 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Carlson Sama|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Tanner-Smith|
|30 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mihiretu Kebede|
|3 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Carlson Sama|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Carlson Sama|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0650-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.