Abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro Gonzalez|
|11 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Andrew Henning|
|13 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junqiao Chen|
|14 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Khadijah Irfah Ismail|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro Gonzalez|
|2 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junqiao Chen|
|31 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Khadijah Irfah Ismail|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0641-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.