Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Abnormal placental cord insertion and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic Reviews20176:242

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0641-1

Received: 22 June 2017

Accepted: 23 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro Gonzalez
11 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Andrew Henning
13 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Junqiao Chen
14 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Khadijah Irfah Ismail
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro Gonzalez
2 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Junqiao Chen
31 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Khadijah Irfah Ismail
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
23 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0641-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
(2)
Biostatistics Department, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
(3)
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Advertisement