Skip to main content

Table 2 Median (IQR) of heterogeneity metrics for the treatment effect when no effect modification was presenta

From: Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis with binary outcomes

Ï„ 2

Prevalence (%)

Number of studies

\(I^{2}_{\mathrm {two-stage}}\)

\(R^{2}_{\mathrm {two-stage}}\)

\(I^{2}_{\mathrm {one-stage}}\)

\(R^{2}_{\mathrm {two-stage}}\)

0.5

30

15

0.10 (0.33)

1.22 (0.80)

0.58 (0.41)

1.75 (1.13)

1.0

30

15

0.44 (0.36)

2.30 (1.76)

0.83 (0.15)

3.29 (2.41)

1.5

30

15

0.58 (0.30)

3.22 (2.53)

0.89 (0.09)

5.84 (4.24)

0.5

70

15

0.01 (0.26)

1.00 (0.65)

0.52 (0.47)

1.76 (1.11)

1.0

70

15

0.39 (0.42)

2.12 (1.69)

0.80 (0.18)

3.33 (2.26)

1.5

70

15

0.55 (0.32)

3.07 (2.67)

0.87 (0.11)

5.66 (4.36)

0.5

30

30

0.12 (0.28)

1.29 (0.72)

0.60 (0.32)

1.79 (0.84)

1.0

30

30

0.47 (0.25)

2.44 (1.29)

0.84 (0.09)

3.49 (1.61)

1.5

30

30

0.62 (0.19)

3.54 (1.98)

0.90 (0.05)

6.32 (3.26)

0.5

70

30

0.06 (0.22)

1.14 (0.57)

0.56 (0.34)

1.81 (0.82)

1.0

70

30

0.42 (0.28)

2.30 (1.30)

0.82 (0.11)

3.52 (1.80)

1.5

70

30

0.59 (0.20)

3.37 (1.93)

0.88 (0.07)

6.36 (3.14)

  1. aPlease note that I 2 is presented here as a proportion varying from 0 to 1, rather than as a percentage