This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis with binary outcomes
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 9 November 2016
Accepted: 17 November 2017
Published: 6 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danielle Burke|
|4 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alessio Crippa|
|20 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Nevitt|
|3 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bo Chen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Nevitt|
|10 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danielle Burke|
|13 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bo Chen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0630-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.