Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant data meta-analysis with binary outcomes

Systematic Reviews20176:243

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0630-4

Received: 9 November 2016

Accepted: 17 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Burke
4 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alessio Crippa
20 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Nevitt
3 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bo Chen
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Nevitt
10 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Burke
13 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bo Chen
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
17 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0630-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
(2)
Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Advertisement