Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes and cost of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap versus implants for breast reconstruction

Systematic Reviews20176:232

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0628-y

Received: 21 August 2017

Accepted: 16 November 2017

Published: 22 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Sprakel
31 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anirudha Agnihotry
11 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ankur Khajuria
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
16 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0628-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
(2)
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK

Advertisement