Clinical reminder alert fatigue in healthcare: a systematic literature review protocol using qualitative evidence
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Wanner|
|11 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Review|
|23 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ruth Backman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Wanner|
|20 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Booth|
|3 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle|
|23 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ruth Backman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|13 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0627-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.